Friday, November 7, 2008

The Difference between “Spread the Wealth” and the Alaska Oil Money Rebate



The Difference between “Spread the Wealth” and the Alaska Oil Money Rebate


After the “Joe the Plumber” incident during the election just past, I heard on several occasions from the Main Stream Media (MSM) that BHO’s “Spread the Wealth” program is no different than the Alaska Oil Rebate program presided over by Gov. Sarah Palin.

After much thought about how to explain this lucidly enough for even the new voters that just recently registered in order to vote for BHO would understand it. I think I have may determined a way to explain the difference. Here it goes..

The Baseline

Let us imagine, for the sake of argument, a housing development with 10 homes. These homes range from humble 1000 square foot Ranches to 4000 square foot ‘McMansions”. This development has some common grounds that require mowing, landscaping, and general maintenance. We will say that the annual cost of this maintenance is $3600.00. This would require that each resident or family pay $30.00 per month or $360.00 per year to cover these costs.


The Alaska Oil Rebate Example

Let us say again, for the sake of argument that a portion of the common property (“Commons”) borders on a local park. This park hosts a festival; a concessionaire approaches the community council, and offers to pay $600.00 a day, for the Saturday and Sunday on which the festival will be held. This will be an un-budgeted windfall for the community. The Community Council appropriates $200.00 of the $1200.00 to use, to pay the landscaping company to clean up and make any repairs to that portion of the “Commons” that may be damaged by the festival goers. They therefore have $1000.00 left over. The Community Council then decides to give the $1000.00 that remains, back to the property owners; they therefore get $100.00 each.


This is of course an very simplistic example, but it is basically what happens in Alaska. The Alaska Govt. leases land to the Oil companies. They then receive payment in royalties from the Oil companies. Instead of keeping that money which is not needed for state operations, they give every ‘Legal’ resident of Alaska a portion of that money.


The Share the Wealth Example



For this example we will break down the residences thus, two 4000 square foot houses (sqf), two 3000 sqf houses, two 2000 sqf houses, and four 1000 sqf houses.


A new president of the community council is elected and he determines that the current community dues program isn’t “fair” to the residents that live in the 1000 sqf houses. He further determines that the “Rich” people of
the community, those with houses over 2000 sqf should pay their “fair share”. Also, in the spirit of “fairness” he determines that a “Graduated Scale” of dues be implemented. This would ensure that those who have the largest homes would “Share” the bulk of the burden. Now for some math, under the original “unfair” plan everyone paid $30.00 each month or $360.00 a year. Under the new “fair”dues plan, the $1440.00 that was previously paid by the 1000 sqf’ers must now be paid by the “Rich” residents. This is how it is to be divided, the 2000 sqf’ers will pay an additional $108.00 each per year, or 15% of the $1440.00, the 3000 sqf’ers will now pay an additional
$252.00 each per year, or 17.5% of the $1440.00. Of course we can’t leave out those evil 4000 sqf’ers, they each will pay an additional $360.00 a year or 50% of the $1440.


This is how in breaks down under the new plan:
























House Size



Dues owed pmth/pyr



4000 sqf




60.00 / 720.00



3000 sqf



51.00 / 612.00



2000 sqf



39.00 / 468.00



1000 sqf



0.00 / 0.00



As time passes, the economy hits hard times, several of the four 1000 sqf’ers can no longer either pay their mortgages or afford food. The council President, showing love and compassion for his neighbors and
friends, decides that the 1000 sqf’ers should get a ‘refund’ on their dues to help them out. They each will get $1000.00 each year from the Community Council.


This how the dues will now be paid: (amounts have been rounded up)

























House Size



Dues owed pmth/pyr



4000 sqf



144.00 / 1728.00



3000 sqf



101.00 / 1212.00



2000 sqf



72.00 / 876.00



1000 sqf



+84.00/ +1008.00



Some will say that this is a bogus example because these people pay the association dues voluntarily and can refuse. That is true they could, but when you purchase a house in a development you agree to a “Covenant”. There are rules pertaining to association dues wherein the Community Council or association can sue you for non–payment of dues and place a lien against your property for the unpaid amount.


By the way, the IRS claims every year when they announce compliance percentages and the amount of receipts to the Federal Govt. That the United States of America has the largest Voluntary tax system in the world.. I bet you didn’t know it was Voluntary, did you? Try not Voluntarily paying and see what happens..



Thursday, November 6, 2008

Observations Of a BigMan

“There’s got to be a morning after” –Maureen McGovern

"I swear by my life and my love of it that I will never
live for the sake of another man, nor ask another man to live for mine." –John Galt


Some observations about the election just past:


You don’t win an election or motivate people to vote, if their motivation is voting against something.. Americans like to be for something not against something…

Most of the voters that voted for John McCain did not vote for him, they voted against Barack Obama.

“Conventional wisdom” from the McCain Campaign and the Main Stream Media (MSM) is that Sarah Palin hurt the campaign and caused John McCain to lose.. “Conventional wisdom” is Neither. The ONLY reason I voted for John McCain, and not Bob Barr (L) is because of Sarah Palin. I believe that approximately one quarter to one half of the voters voted for McCain for
the same reason.. Some polls say she brought his tally up by 13%, like I said I think it was really two to three time that number.

Barack Obama does not have a “Mandate”, for the same reason George W Bush did not have a Mandate in 2004.. How can I say that? Am I just a Racist? No, the MSM stated in 2004 that George W Bush didn’t have a Mandate when he won with 62,040,610 popular votes.. Barack Obama had 64,043,290, I do not see how the addition of 2,002,680 votes creates a “Mandate”.

Karl Rove, “The Architect” (GWB Campaign Mgr), has stated that the election shows that the Republican Party needs to move to the Left… NO IT DOESN’T !!! The problem was that it already moved to far to the Left. John McCain is a very Liberal Republican, he was considered for and he considered being John Kerry’s VP. He sponsored the Amnesty bill of 2007 along
with Ted Kennedy, the one that a majority of Americans were against. He also believes in Cap and Trade as a solution for Global Warming. First Global Warming is a hoax, the Science isn’t settled, and true Science is NEVER settled. Cap and Trade is an International Spread the Wealth program. It will spread the wealth from industrialized wealthy nations to non-industrialized third world nations. It has nothing to do with Global Warming, if Global Warming were real, Cap and Trade would not change the levels of CO2, Countries and Companies would just pay for the extra cost of doing business by passing the cost to us, the consumers.


I can only hope things are not destroyed too bad and we can make it until 2010 wherein we can vote in a Republican congress to hold Obama in check…



Palin ‘12